Three Felonies A Day: How the Feds Target the Innocent.
 Click jacket for Amazon Click here to read review. |
|
|
|
|
|
Swomley & Associates News
|
Bernard F. Baran
|
|
Written by Jack Dew, Berkshire Eagle Staff
|
|
06.11.2009 : Thu |
Controversial cases from the 1980s share much in common, but one thing
PITTSFIELD — Before Bernard Baran's case was overturned, there were the Amiraults, a mother and her two adult children who were convicted of molesting youngsters at their Fells Acres day care center in Malden and have never cleared their names.
At first, the two cases moved in lockstep: Both were prosecuted in 1985 amid a wave of child abuse investigations at day care centers across the country. Both were found guilty and mounted lengthy appeals.
But only Baran has been able to overturn his conviction.
"The two are linked," said James L. Sultan, who represented the Amiraults during their appeals. "The Amirault case taught us how important it is that children in these kinds of situations are questioned properly, and how improper questioning techniques, even if done with the best of intentions, can lead to unreliable and false accusations."
No defense for this trial By Rinaldo Del Gallo
Thursday, June 11
PITTSFIELD - The primary duty of a prosecutor is not to convict, but to see to it impartial justice is done the guilty as well as the innocent. As the Appellate Court put it in the Baran case, "A prosecuting attorney's obligation is to secure a fair and impartial trial for the public and for the defendant. His obligation to the defendant in this regard is as great as is his obligation to the public." It is true District Attorney David Capeless inherited the case and was not involved in its original prosecution; but in trying to uphold the conviction he vouched that not only that Baran was guilty, but that the trial Baran received was fair.
If Baran did not receive a fair trial, Capeless should have consented to the motion and retried the case, rather than contest the motion for a new trial.
In an excoriating opinion, the Appellate Court concluded, "it cannot be said that the defendant received anything close to a fair trial." At the original trial, the prosecution made repeated reference to Baran's homosexuality, which the court correctly noted was an "explosive topic" in the '80s and "had no relevance to the charged crimes." The prosecution culminated in closing arguments where it was argued that Baran "could have raped and sodomized and abused those children whenever he felt the primitive urge to satisfy his sexual appetite."
As to whether the prosecution improperly failed to hand over exculpatory evidence that might have prevented Baran from spending 22 years in prison, the Appellate Court wrote, "While the record does not settle the question whether the unedited videotapes were deliberately withheld by the prosecution, there are indications in the trial transcript consistent with that contention." In other words, we do not know for sure, but it smells fishy.
The unedited tapes that were not turned over revealed significant vacillation and uncertainty on the part of many, if not all, of the children interviewed. The tapes also contained considerable material from which it could be inferred that the children's testimony was coached. The court noted that it was "particularly powerful" that in numerous instances various complainants denied that the defendant had engaged in any misconduct. Also not turned over were documents from the Department of Social Services that a "boy A" and a "girl E" each had been molested by their respective mother's boyfriends.
The closing arguments were ruled to have constituted flagrant prosecutorial misconduct. It was stated that the prosecutor's closing "contained a number of passages apparently designed to inflame the jurors' passions." According to the Mass Rules of Professional Conduct, a prosecutor shall "not assert a personal opinion as to the justness of a cause, as to the credibility of a witness, or as to the guilt or innocence of an accused."
---------- As for improperly vouching for the credibility of the witnesses the prosecution argued, "if ever there was a case where the ends of justice literally cry out for a guilty verdict, this is that case because truth is the mother of justice and in this case truth came literally from the mouths of babes."
The prosecutor began his closing by exhorting the jury to return a guilty verdict "in the name of justice and decency." The prosecution ended, "The only ones who win are the people of the commonwealth of Massachusetts who win when justice is done. And the only ones who lose are the people of the commonwealth of Massachusetts who lose when justice is thwarted. I beseech you — I beg you — think of those children and bring back a verdict of guilty on each and every one of these charges."
The lines of what is prosecutorial misconduct are not always clear. But when a prosecutor makes a closing argument that sounds like a guilty verdict must be delivered by the jury in the name of truth, justice, and for the love of children, (rather than the facts indicate guilty), and then goes on to state that justice will be thwarted if the jury fails to deliver a guilty verdict, that line was crossed long ago.
Had the case been retried, there would have been a serious issue of whether individuals that were ages 2-4 could honestly remember the crime, or whether that would have been during the period of childhood amnesia.
I asked Professor Elizabeth Loftus of the University of California, one of the nation's foremost experts on childhood memory, what is the likelihood of a false memory in an adult regarding sexual abuse that they allegedly experienced as 2, 3 or 4 year olds if people were repeatedly subjected to leading questions and/or questioning wherein it was suggested that there was a "correct answer"? She replied that "Suggestions can lead to false memories. They can make people believe they had experiences as children that they didn't really have." She added, "Adults don't have concrete reliable memories for things occurring before or at about age 3. This phenomenon is called 'child amnesia.' "
Capeless would have had a tough case given the effects on the adult mind of the discredited interviewing techniques experienced during or slightly after the period of childhood amnesia. Arguably, since tapes likely to have contained exculpatory evidence (given the case's track record) have been lost, there was an additional ground not to retry the case. However, Capeless failed in his ethical obligation not to defend this farce of a "trial."
Rinaldo Del Gallo is a practicing attorney whose freelance columns have appeared in newspapers across the country.
Good News for a Change: The Bernard Baran Case is Over! June 09, 2009
The Berkshire (Mass.) Eagle reports today that Berkshire District Attorney David Capeless held a press conference at 11 am, at which he announced that he will not appeal the court of appeals ruling and will not attempt to re-try Bernard Baran, which means the case is finally over.
Baran was convicted in 1985 in a blatantly unfair trial of having molested a bunch of little boys and girls at a day care center where he was working. Baran, an openly gay man, was apparently "set-up" for this prosecution by a hysterical family that may have been trying to cover its own tracks on the issue of child abuse, and the local prosecutor, Daniel Ford, jumped into the thing with glee, riding the resultant publicity to election to the Superior Court bench. Baran, serving a life sentence, continued to proclaim his innocence, but he served 21 years until a group of intrepid supporters raised the money necessary for a proper investigation of the case, which resulted in a ruling in 2006 by Superior Court Judge Francis Fecteau that Baran's conviction had to be vacated due to the incompetent legal representation he had received.
Probably in deference to the original prosecutor, who as noted above is now a sitting trial judge, Fecteau fought shy of finding that there was prosecutorial misconduct in the case, and didn't even address the issue that Baran was deprived of a public trial -- a right guaranteed in the federal Bill of Rights in criminal cases -- when the judge excluded the public and press from the courtroom during the testimony of the alleged child victims (many of whom, by the way, have long since recanted their stories of molestation). Apparently seeking to vindicate his predecessor's actions, or perhaps to win favor with Judge Ford, the current D.A. appealed Fecteau's ruling, only to run into a real buzz-saw at the court of appeals, where Judge Lenk not only affirmed Fecteau's ruling on incompetent representation, but found the "public trial" violation by itself would be sufficient to reverse the conviction and that, although Judge Fecteau did not make the necessary findings in his opinion to support a conclusion to this effect, the trial record suggested prosecutorial misconduct as well.
If Massachusetts has an adequately functioning system of prosecutorial and judicial ethical oversight, somebody about now should be launching an investigation into the ethics of Judge Ford, and somebody in the state government should be figuring out some suitable compensation to Mr. Baran for wrongfully taking 21 years of his life, putting him into a state prison system where he suffered physical abuse and deprived him of his young adulthood. The state bears some responsibility here. Who wiill take up this issue now that Baran is vindicated and freed?
|
|
Last Updated ( 06.12.2009 : Fri )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
Patrick I. Powell
|
|
Written by Michelle Laczkoski, Milford Daily News
|
|
06.11.2009 : Thu |
  DaShawn Jackson WORCESTER — Jurors heard conflicting testimony yesterday about the interactions between Daniel Columbo and Patrick Powell, the man charged with his slaying in Milford in 2006. The defense's first witness, DaShawn Jackson, took the stand yesterday afternoon. His testimony largely contradicted the facts presented by the prosecution's previous witness, Joshua Phipps. In earlier testimony, Phipps said Powell pointed a rifle at Columbo three days before Columbo was killed. Jackson told a Worcester Superior Court jury yesterday that never happened. Columbo died on Jan. 6, 2006, after he was stabbed once in the chest during a street fight with four teens. Powell, now 19, is on trial for fatally stabbing Columbo. Vinnie Ruscitti is charged with murder on the theory of a joint venture. Phipps and Steven Carvalho have been charged as accessories in Columbo's death. |
|
Last Updated ( 06.28.2009 : Sun )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Bernard F. Baran
|
|
Written by Jack Dew, Berkshire Eagle Staff
|
|
06.10.2009 : Wed |
Baran's family can put the past finally behind

 Bernard Baran Jr. sheds a tear after leaving Berkshire County Superior Court House on Tuesday. Baran served 21 years in prison on a child molestation conviction that was overturned in June 2006. PITTSFIELD — Just after 3 p.m. on Tuesday, Bernard Baran turned a corner on Wendell Avenue and, holding his mother's hand, walked up the stairs of the Berkshire Superior Court to claim his freedom. In a plain office on the second floor of the Probation Department, Baran rested his foot on a metal chair while the last remnant of his imprisonment — an electronic monitoring bracelet belted around his ankle — was cut loose. After 21 years in prison and three years under close court supervision, he was free. A 24-year saga Wednesday, June 10
A time line of events in the Bernard Baran Jr. case:
October 1984: Bernard Baran Jr. is arrested on charges that he molested children at the Early Childhood Development Center in Pittsfield. January 1985: Baran is found guilty by a Superior Court jury of three counts of rape and five counts of indecent assault and battery. He is sentenced to three concurrent life prison terms. March 1986: The Massachusetts Appeals Court upholds Baran's convictions. The Supreme Judicial Court refuses to review the decision. June 2004: A new legal team files a motion for a new trial in Berkshire Superior Court. The case is moved to Worcester. June 2005: Judge Francis R. Fecteau conducts hearings over five days on the motion for a new trial. June 2006: Fecteau overturns Baran's convictions and orders a new trial. Berkshire District Attorney David F. Capeless appeals. Baran goes free on bond. February 2008: The appeals court hears oral arguments in Capeless' appeal. May 15, 2009: The appeals court upholds Fecteau's decision. Baran remains free. June 9, 2009: Capeless announces that he will drop the case against Baran, ending the prosecution after 25 years.
A Letter From Bee Baran’s Niece, Crystal June 11, 2009 Posted by bobchatelle in Baran, Innocents. Dear Friend of Justice, Crystal emailed us the following letter today, with permission to post: Dear Bob & Jim: Let me start by thanking you both for everything you have done for Bernie and my family, for without your intelligence, wisdom, courage, charisma, love, support, generosity and commitment to right the many wrongs of the justice system and government, we would not have FREEDOM, 06/09/09! I am not sure if I am the first of my family to write you a letter, but I am sure I will not be the last. Also, we are still trying to catch our breath. Before I go on any further I just want to tell you that I am writing this letter without my Uncle Bernie’s or my family’s knowledge or input. I only tell you this because my thoughts, ideas and perceptions of things are my own. I am sure you will see the family resemblance in some feelings I will be sharing with you. As friends of our family, you’ll understand. On Monday night, June 8th as the word spread through our family about Capeless’s “secret” press conference, we quickly worked out all of our schedules so that we could be together to hear the news. The fear loomed large, none of us slept, and when we talked, we tried not to mention the outcome all of us dreaded to hear the most. While my mouth spewed positive reinforcement, my heart and mind were heavy with nagging, negative emotion. This may seem pessimistic to some, but Capeless, Ford and numerous others have never “done the right thing” by Bernie. I know you can understand this because you were the ones to point out all of the injustices done to Bernie so we could be where we are today. I also know it is evident how doubt, fear and injustice have always been players in our lives. When Tuesday a.m. rolled around, Bernie and Dave left their house early, to make the trip from Boston, so that we could be together as a family when the news was read. Bernie was worried if we went to Capeless’s office that day and the alleged victims or believers of Ford’s lies were there, someone might say hurtful things or worse yet, physically hurt his mother. Meanwhile, my grandmother was talking to me on the other line about how to protect Bernie from the same thing. They both have endured too many years of discrimination, hate and ignorance, so we decided it would be best if they stayed in an undisclosed location until the press conference was over. My Uncle Santo and I would wait at Capeless’s office (in the hallway of course, because while we are tax-paying citizens and Capeless is a public servant, or so I thought, we were denied access) until his decision was given, so that we could call Bernie and my grandmother right away. Many thoughts raced through my head in those tense moments, like the underhanded way that Capeless silently slithered behind all of our backs to call this press conference in the first place. Then I heard these words, Capeless is dropping the case! I couldn‘t breathe, did I hear right? BUT…his “decision was not based upon any judgment that Baran did not do what he was convicted of…” and SLAM, just like that his moral compass headed south yet again, so I knew it had to be true. Do the lies and back covering ever end? Then it hit me, this is the way they wanted it, (to use your euphemism), to keep an “elephant hiding under a rug“. They were going to go out the same way they came in, never admitting their wrongs, never apologizing or taking responsibility for ruining an innocent, young man’s life. Nonetheless, I tried not to dwell on his reasons. I was just glad it was over for now. The feeling was surreal as I kept repeating to myself that this was not a dream and that Bernie was free. With tears streaming down my face I raced for my car, pulled myself together enough to drive to my grandmother’s house where I would find my grandmother and Bernie embracing each other and weeping harder than I ever heard either of them weep. All of us took turns holding each other, crying together and repeating the words, ‘it’s over” and “freedom”. When emotions settled down we had a modest celebration, no expensive wine or big party, just a scarred family trying to begin anew. While we cried, laughed, rejoiced and thanked people I couldn’t help but realize as I looked around at my family, how much was truly taken from us. Freedom’s price was never more evident to me until I looked at the aging faces of my family. My grandmother is no longer the young woman she was when Bernie was first arrested. The fight is still in her but she is getting weary from the long, hard, and unfair journey. Her face tells the tale of a woman who has fought hard the battle of life, but needs to have justice prevail. Bernie is no longer the youthful, vibrant eighteen year old who used to take me to the park, push me on the swings, dance to Solid Gold with me, read me bedtime stories or let me sneak out of bed to stay up late, watch TV & eat snacks. My mother and my other uncles, Santo and Clint, are all older now, have kids and even grandkids of their own. The love we have will carry us into our futures, but it can never make up the time we lost. As we began to talk of adventures we wanted to go on (Bernie has never seen a palm tree) and what our next move would be (the closest thing we ever had to a family vacation is when the prison used to have family day), I realized it would be short lived. None of us have the means or money to take a family vacation or even allow Bernie to live the life he deserves. All of us live humbly and have to work to survive, especially Bernie, living in Boston. There was going to be no time off for my hardworking grandmother or Bernie to celebrate and really absorb what had just happened! You would think after a quarter century of rules, restrictions and false imprisonment that Bernie would be able to live life the way he wants to, but he can’t. We can never get back the time that was stolen from our family, but I need your help to raise money for Bernie, so that he can get one step closer to full freedom, financially, physically and mentally. While most of us have had time to go to college, choose careers, make our own life mistakes, fall in love, travel, explore, and just experience life, Bernie never has. His youth and innocence were stolen from him and while some financial freedom will never make up for this loss, at least it will enable him to not worry and really, really live life the way he wants to. My grandmother is not getting younger and her family’s history is not one of longevity (she is the only one to live past 65). I do not say this as a scare tactic but to help understand how precious Bernie’s time is with her. Their years to be together are numbered and I don’t want them wasting precious moments worrying about how to do it. In my opinion, it will never be over until Ford is brought to justice. Until that happens I need your help to make life more breathable for Bernie. That is why I am reaching out to the two of you once again, to help my husband and me to organize a fundraiser for Bernie at our house, a Freedom ‘09‘ party. We want anyone who can make it to be here, supporters, lawyers, and friends. You can come see our home when you come to Pittsfield, we have the yard for it. I haven’t discussed it with Bernie or my grandmother yet, but I want to do this for them. My grandmother is the backbone of my family, Bernie is my hero. Together they taught me about sorrow, adversity, hope, pride, truth, justice, commitment, faith, respect, honor, loyalty and love. I can never give them the freedom and peace they deserve, but with your help I can try. Please help me help them. With all my love and gratitude, Crystal Squires xoxo PS-You can do with this letter what you wish. I know in the past they have been posted.
It’s Over! June 9, 2009 Bob Chatelle, Friends of Justice
This morning Berkshire County DA David Capeless finally announced that he would no longer pursue the Baran case. When I spoke with Bee a little while ago, he was shedding some very well-earned tears. He and his family have been living this nightmare for almost a quarter of a century. Jim D’Entremont and I are relative newcomers to the case. We’ve only been involved for 11 years. My mind is racing. One question that pops into mind: Does this mean that the system worked? My first inclination is to say, “Hell, no! The system didn’t work. We worked. We worked damn hard fighting the power of a hearltess macchine.” But this wouldn’t give credit to those people in the system who did work, and who worked very hard. I think especially of Judges Fecteau, Lenk, Duffly and Green and their staffs. There was a tremendous amout of material. They read it all, they read it thoughtfully, and they responded with two beautiful decisions. I am most grateful. Whenever I’m tempted to think too unkindly of judges, I will do my best to remember these. Nevertheless, this hard-won victory proves that there are very serious things wrong with our judicial system. Ten years ago, I read the Baran trial transcript for the first time. It is appalling. The injustice was so blatant, that I naively thought it would not take that long to free him. Boy was I wrong. You can’t fight power without money. And we had none. So we started to raise it. To date we’ve raised about $320,000. We were lucky to find a few big donors. But most of that came from concerned citizens of limited means. This is what it costs when ordinary people are forced to do the job that should be done by the government. Our expenses, however, thus far total $589,000. This is just what has been actually billed. A great many services were donated. All of our expert witnesses, for example, were not paid a dime. The lawyers donated time. And the lawyers know that most of their bill will never be paid. Should it really take citizens over ten years and over half a million dollars to right a greivous wrong committed by their own government? I would like to think that the Baran case might eventually lead to some meaningful judicial reform. But I’m not holding my breath. That would require a lot of work from good citizens. Democracy requires more than voting — and far too few Americans even do that. Democracy requires that citizens inform themselves, work for needed reforms, and hold their government accountable for its actions. What comes of this is not up to me. It’s up to you. As for me, as soon as we catch our breath, we are going to savor this victory and celebrate it.
Back outside in the damp afternoon, Baran and his small group of friends and family huddled briefly. There were no plans for a celebration, just a trip home. "I came (to the Berkshires) today because my mother had to watch her innocent son being taken away 24 years ago, and I can't imagine what that was like for her," he said. "I knew today that I had to be here — be here with her — when we got the news, whether it was good or bad." Baran's older brother, Santo, was turned away on Tuesday morning when he tried to attend the press conference where Berkshire District Attorney David F. Capeless said he would not seek to prosecute Baran on child molestation charges. He waited outside for word and then relayed the news to Baran. |
|
Last Updated ( 06.13.2009 : Sat )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Bernard F. Baran
|
|
Written by Miranda Grossman, CBS3 Springfield
|
|
06.09.2009 : Tue |
 After more than two decades behind bars, an accused child molester is freed. The Berkshire County man was sentenced to life in jail. But the charges against him were overturned in 2006. The Berkshire District Attorney announced on Tuesday he will not re-try the case. After 25 years, the District Attorney officially closed the case against Bernard Baran. Baran was convicted of molesting five children at a Pittsfield daycare center in 1984. "About time, shouldn't have happened to begin with," said Santo Baran. Relief, backed with years of resentment, from Santo Baran. His brother Bernard was only 19 years old when he was arrested and later sentenced to life in prison. "There was no evidence in the beginning of it, and shouldn't have gone to trial," said Santo Baran. |
|
Last Updated ( 06.27.2009 : Sat )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
| | << Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
| | Results 33 - 40 of 109 |
|
|
|
|